この2つの問題形式は予測可能な論理に従っています。文と文の関係、または設問が求める正確な目的を見極めれば、正解ははっきりします。
Transitions and Rhetorical Synthesis questions follow predictable logic. Identify the relationship between sentences, or the exact goal in the question, and the right answer becomes clear.
Two Expression of Ideas question types — Transitions and Rhetorical Synthesis — reward clear logical thinking more than advanced reading skills. With a simple method, they can become some of your most reliable points.
Transitions: find the relationship first
In a Transitions question, a short text has a blank where a linking word or phrase belongs. The four choices are transitions such as *however*, *therefore*, *for example* and *similarly*.
Do not look at the choices first. Instead, read the sentences before and after the blank and decide their relationship:
- Contrast — the second idea goes against the first: however, by contrast, nevertheless, instead.
- Cause and effect — the second is a result of the first: therefore, as a result, consequently, accordingly.
- Addition — the second adds a similar point: moreover, furthermore, in addition.
- Similarity — the second is alike in some way: similarly, likewise.
- Example — the second illustrates the first: for example, for instance, specifically.
- Sequence — time order: subsequently, meanwhile, ultimately.
- Emphasis or correction — in fact, indeed.
Once you know the relationship, only one choice usually fits. Many wrong answers are transitions from a different category — for example, a contrast word where the sentences actually show a result.
Example
"The new bridge halved travel time between the towns. ______, local businesses reported more customers from across the river."
More customers is a result of easier travel, so the answer is a cause-and-effect transition such as *As a result*.
Rhetorical Synthesis: answer the goal, not the topic
In a Rhetorical Synthesis question, you see a student's bullet-point notes and a goal, such as:
The student wants to emphasise how long construction took.
All four choices are usually true and use information from the notes. The correct answer is the one that achieves the specific goal.
A three-step method
- Read the goal first, before the notes. Underline the key words: *emphasise the size*, *contrast the habitats*, *explain an advantage*, *introduce the study to an audience unfamiliar with it*.
- Check each choice against the goal only. Ask: does this sentence do exactly what the goal asks?
- Eliminate true-but-irrelevant choices. A sentence about where the reef is does not "emphasise its size", even if it is accurate.
Watch for goal words like contrast (the answer must mention both things and show a difference), similarity (both things and what they share), and audience (an unfamiliar audience needs background information).
Why these questions are worth practising
Both question types follow consistent logic, so practice gives quick, lasting improvement. They also build skills you need for university writing: connecting ideas clearly and selecting information for a purpose.
Practise next
- Transitions practice
- Rhetorical Synthesis practice
- Learn all transition words in the SAT dictionary
- Try a timed Reading and Writing module
このガイドはAUSLEXによる一般的な学習アドバイスで、試験実施団体とは関係ありません。試験形式・受験料・必要スコアは変わることがあるため、申込や出願の前に必ず公式サイトを確認してください。